Finland vs Northern Africa: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Northern Africa
36.1%
in 2025
Finland rank
12th
Northern Africa rank
10th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Finland
- Northern Africa
How they compare
Finland currently reports 97.0% against 36.1% in Northern Africa, a difference of 60.9%.
That makes Finland's figure about 2.7 times Northern Africa's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 12th and Northern Africa ranks 10th of 195 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Northern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.3% | 21.0% | 69.3% | Finland |
| 2010s | 96.9% | 28.4% | 68.5% | Finland |
| 2020s | 97.0% | 35.0% | 61.9% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Finland or Northern Africa?
- Finland, at 97.0% against 36.1% in Northern Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Finland and Northern Africa?
- 60.9%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Northern Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Northern Africa rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Finland ranks 12th and Northern Africa ranks 10th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.