Finland vs Réunion: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Réunion
91.7%
in 2025
Finland rank
12th
Réunion rank
15th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Finland
- Réunion
How they compare
Finland currently reports 97.0% against 91.7% in Réunion, a difference of 5.3%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Réunion's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 12th and Réunion ranks 15th of 167 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Réunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.3% | 29.9% | 60.5% | Finland |
| 2010s | 96.9% | 91.7% | 5.2% | Finland |
| 2020s | 97.0% | 91.7% | 5.2% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Finland or Réunion?
- Finland, at 97.0% against 91.7% in Réunion as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Finland and Réunion?
- 5.3%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Réunion?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Réunion rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Finland ranks 12th and Réunion ranks 15th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.