Finland vs Timor-Leste: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Timor-Leste
50.8%
in 2025
Finland rank
12th
Timor-Leste rank
5th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Finland
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Finland currently reports 97.0% against 50.8% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 46.2%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.9 times Timor-Leste's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 12th and Timor-Leste ranks 5th of 167 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.3% | 21.7% | 68.6% | Finland |
| 2010s | 96.9% | 47.6% | 49.4% | Finland |
| 2020s | 97.0% | 50.8% | 46.2% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Finland or Timor-Leste?
- Finland, at 97.0% against 50.8% in Timor-Leste as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Finland and Timor-Leste?
- 46.2%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Timor-Leste?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Timor-Leste rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Finland ranks 12th and Timor-Leste ranks 5th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.