Georgia vs Serbia: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Georgia
56.7%
in 2025
Serbia
57.1%
in 2025
Georgia rank
74th
Serbia rank
72nd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 57.1% against 56.7% in Georgia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 74th and Serbia ranks 72nd of 167 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.7% | 27.5% | 6.2% | Georgia |
| 2010s | 48.2% | 34.7% | 13.5% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 54.4% | 50.5% | 3.9% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 57.1% against 56.7% in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Georgia and Serbia?
- 0.4%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Georgia ranks 74th and Serbia ranks 72nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.