Ghana vs Namibia: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Ghana
83.7%
in 2025
Namibia
83.9%
in 2025
Ghana rank
27th
Namibia rank
26th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Ghana
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 83.9% against 83.7% in Ghana, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 26th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.4% | 57.4% | 22.1% | Ghana |
| 2010s | 83.7% | 82.8% | 0.8% | Ghana |
| 2020s | 83.7% | 83.9% | 0.2% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Ghana or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 83.9% against 83.7% in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Ghana and Namibia?
- 0.2%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Namibia rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Ghana ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 26th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.