Gibraltar vs Sri Lanka: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Gibraltar
31.6%
in 2025
Sri Lanka
30.4%
in 2025
Gibraltar rank
117th
Sri Lanka rank
119th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Gibraltar
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 31.6% against 30.4% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Gibraltar has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 117th and Sri Lanka ranks 119th of 167 countries.
Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.5% | 21.8% | 9.7% | Gibraltar |
| 2010s | 31.6% | 30.2% | 1.5% | Gibraltar |
| 2020s | 31.6% | 30.4% | 1.2% | Gibraltar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Gibraltar or Sri Lanka?
- Gibraltar, at 31.6% against 30.4% in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Gibraltar and Sri Lanka?
- 1.2%, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Gibraltar and Sri Lanka rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Gibraltar ranks 117th and Sri Lanka ranks 119th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.