Greece vs Namibia: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Greece
83.2%
in 2025
Namibia
83.9%
in 2025
Greece rank
28th
Namibia rank
26th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Greece
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 83.9% against 83.2% in Greece, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Greece ranks 28th and Namibia ranks 26th of 163 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.3% | 57.4% | 12.1% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 82.5% | 82.8% | 0.3% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 83.2% | 83.9% | 0.7% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Greece or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 83.9% against 83.2% in Greece as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Greece and Namibia?
- 0.7%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Greece and Namibia rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Greece ranks 28th and Namibia ranks 26th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.