Greenland vs Rwanda: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Greenland
30.1%
in 2025
Rwanda
30.1%
in 2025
Greenland rank
122nd
Rwanda rank
121st
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Greenland
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 30.1% against 30.1% in Greenland, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Greenland ranks 122nd and Rwanda ranks 121st of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.4% | 24.7% | 2.3% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 29.3% | 27.6% | 1.7% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 30.1% | 29.5% | 0.6% | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Greenland or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 30.1% against 30.1% in Greenland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Greenland and Rwanda?
- 0.0%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Rwanda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Greenland and Rwanda rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Greenland ranks 122nd and Rwanda ranks 121st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.