Grenada vs Malawi: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Grenada
62.8%
in 2025
Malawi
63.4%
in 2025
Grenada rank
65th
Malawi rank
62nd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Grenada
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 63.4% against 62.8% in Grenada, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 65th and Malawi ranks 62nd of 167 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.8% | 63.4% | 0.6% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 62.8% | 63.4% | 0.6% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 62.8% | 63.4% | 0.6% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Grenada or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 63.4% against 62.8% in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Grenada and Malawi?
- 0.6%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Malawi?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and Malawi rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Grenada ranks 65th and Malawi ranks 62nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.