Iceland vs Mozambique: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Iceland
40.7%
in 2025
Mozambique
42.4%
in 2025
Iceland rank
98th
Mozambique rank
95th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Iceland
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 42.4% against 40.7% in Iceland, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 98th and Mozambique ranks 95th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.3% | 27.8% | 0.5% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 32.5% | 41.6% | 9.1% | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 39.3% | 42.4% | 3.1% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Iceland or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 42.4% against 40.7% in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Iceland and Mozambique?
- 1.7%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mozambique?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Mozambique rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Iceland ranks 98th and Mozambique ranks 95th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.