Iceland vs Tunisia: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Iceland
40.7%
in 2025
Tunisia
39.9%
in 2025
Iceland rank
98th
Tunisia rank
99th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Iceland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 40.7% against 39.9% in Tunisia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 98th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.3% | 20.4% | 7.9% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 32.5% | 38.6% | 6.1% | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 39.3% | 39.9% | 0.5% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Iceland or Tunisia?
- Iceland, at 40.7% against 39.9% in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Iceland and Tunisia?
- 0.8%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Tunisia rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Iceland ranks 98th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.