Iceland vs Uzbekistan: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Iceland
40.7%
in 2025
Uzbekistan
41.1%
in 2025
Iceland rank
115th
Uzbekistan rank
113th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Iceland
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 41.1% against 40.7% in Iceland, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Iceland ranks 115th and Uzbekistan ranks 113th of 195 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.3% | 29.3% | 1.0% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 32.5% | 32.5% | 0.1% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 39.3% | 40.7% | 1.4% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Iceland or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 41.1% against 40.7% in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Iceland and Uzbekistan?
- 0.4%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Uzbekistan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Uzbekistan rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Iceland ranks 115th and Uzbekistan ranks 113th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.