Indonesia vs Rwanda: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Indonesia
28.0%
in 2025
Rwanda
30.1%
in 2025
Indonesia rank
124th
Rwanda rank
121st
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Indonesia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 30.1% against 28.0% in Indonesia, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 124th and Rwanda ranks 121st of 167 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.3% | 24.7% | 8.4% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 25.2% | 27.6% | 2.4% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 28.0% | 29.5% | 1.4% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Indonesia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 30.1% against 28.0% in Indonesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Indonesia and Rwanda?
- 2.1%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Rwanda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Indonesia and Rwanda rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Indonesia ranks 124th and Rwanda ranks 121st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.