Israel vs Sri Lanka: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Israel
30.4%
in 2025
Sri Lanka
30.4%
in 2025
Israel rank
120th
Sri Lanka rank
119th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Israel
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 30.4% against 30.4% in Israel, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Israel ranks 120th and Sri Lanka ranks 119th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.5% | 21.8% | 0.6% | Israel |
| 2010s | 28.2% | 30.2% | 2.0% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 30.0% | 30.4% | 0.4% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Israel or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 30.4% against 30.4% in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Israel and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Sri Lanka rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Israel ranks 120th and Sri Lanka ranks 119th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.