Kazakhstan vs Kenya: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Kazakhstan
46.8%
in 2025
Kenya
47.0%
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
87th
Kenya rank
85th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 47.0% against 46.8% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 87th and Kenya ranks 85th of 167 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.6% | 46.2% | 13.6% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 41.9% | 47.0% | 5.1% | Kenya |
| 2020s | 46.8% | 47.0% | 0.2% | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Kazakhstan or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 47.0% against 46.8% in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Kazakhstan and Kenya?
- 0.2%, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kenya?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kenya rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Kazakhstan ranks 87th and Kenya ranks 85th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.