Mexico vs Sri Lanka: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Mexico
32.6%
in 2025
Sri Lanka
30.4%
in 2025
Mexico rank
116th
Sri Lanka rank
119th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Mexico
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 32.6% against 30.4% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mexico ranks 116th and Sri Lanka ranks 119th of 167 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.4% | 21.8% | 1.5% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 30.7% | 30.2% | 0.6% | Mexico |
| 2020s | 31.6% | 30.4% | 1.2% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Mexico or Sri Lanka?
- Mexico, at 32.6% against 30.4% in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Mexico and Sri Lanka?
- 2.2%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and Sri Lanka rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Mexico ranks 116th and Sri Lanka ranks 119th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.