New Zealand vs Saint Helena: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
New Zealand
34.0%
in 2025
Saint Helena
33.7%
in 2025
New Zealand rank
132nd
Saint Helena rank
133rd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- New Zealand
- Saint Helena
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 34.0% against 33.7% in Saint Helena, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Helena ahead.
New Zealand ranks 132nd and Saint Helena ranks 133rd of 195 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Saint Helena | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.3% | 28.6% | 0.7% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 33.5% | 30.6% | 2.9% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 34.0% | 33.7% | 0.3% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, New Zealand or Saint Helena?
- New Zealand, at 34.0% against 33.7% in Saint Helena as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between New Zealand and Saint Helena?
- 0.3%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Saint Helena?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and Saint Helena rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- New Zealand ranks 132nd and Saint Helena ranks 133rd of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.