Nicaragua vs Sao Tome and Principe: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Nicaragua
74.8%
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
73.6%
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
48th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
51st
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Nicaragua
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 74.8% against 73.6% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 48th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 51st of 195 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.5% | 29.4% | 40.1% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 73.9% | 73.6% | 0.4% | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 74.8% | 73.6% | 1.3% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Nicaragua or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Nicaragua, at 74.8% against 73.6% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 1.2%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Nicaragua ranks 48th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 51st of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.