Nigeria vs Serbia: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Nigeria
57.1%
in 2025
Serbia
57.1%
in 2025
Nigeria rank
71st
Serbia rank
72nd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Nigeria
- Serbia
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 57.1% against 57.1% in Serbia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Nigeria ranks 71st and Serbia ranks 72nd of 167 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.8% | 27.5% | 22.2% | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 49.8% | 34.7% | 15.1% | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 57.1% | 50.5% | 6.7% | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Nigeria or Serbia?
- Nigeria, at 57.1% against 57.1% in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Nigeria and Serbia?
- 0.0%, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Serbia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Nigeria and Serbia rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Nigeria ranks 71st and Serbia ranks 72nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.