Northern Africa vs Poland: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Northern Africa
36.1%
in 2025
Poland
94.3%
in 2025
Northern Africa rank
10th
Poland rank
15th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Northern Africa
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 94.3% against 36.1% in Northern Africa, a difference of 58.2%.
That makes Poland's figure about 2.6 times Northern Africa's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Northern Africa ranks 10th and Poland ranks 15th of 23 groups.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.0% | 79.3% | 58.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 28.4% | 92.8% | 64.3% | Poland |
| 2020s | 35.0% | 93.8% | 58.8% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Northern Africa or Poland?
- Poland, at 94.3% against 36.1% in Northern Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Northern Africa and Poland?
- 58.2%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Poland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Northern Africa and Poland rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Northern Africa ranks 10th and Poland ranks 15th of 23 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.