Norway vs United Republic of Tanzania: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Norway
67.4%
in 2025
United Republic of Tanzania
66.5%
in 2025
Norway rank
61st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
63rd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Norway
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Norway currently reports 67.4% against 66.5% in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
Norway ranks 61st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 63rd of 195 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.4% | 55.2% | 4.8% | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2010s | 63.2% | 58.0% | 5.3% | Norway |
| 2020s | 67.4% | 66.5% | 0.9% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Norway or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Norway, at 67.4% against 66.5% in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Norway and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0.9%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Norway and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Norway ranks 61st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 63rd of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.