Oceania vs Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered

Oceania
22.4%
in 2025
Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
88.6%
in 2025
Oceania rank
21st
Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands rank
25th

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time

  • Oceania
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
020406080200020122025

How they compare

Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands currently reports 88.6% against 22.4% in Oceania, a difference of 66.2%.

That makes Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands's figure about 4.0 times Oceania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Oceania ahead.

Oceania ranks 21st and Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands ranks 25th of 23 groups.

Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 15.0% 18.9% 3.9% Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
2010s 18.9% 69.4% 50.5% Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
2020s 22.1% 86.4% 64.2% Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Oceania or Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands?
Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands, at 88.6% against 22.4% in Oceania as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Oceania and Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands?
66.2%, with Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Oceania and Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
Oceania ranks 21st and Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands ranks 25th of 23 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania vs Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/oceania/svalbard-and-jan-mayen-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/oceania/svalbard-and-jan-mayen-islands/">Oceania vs Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
218 places, 5,668 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed