Oceania vs Zimbabwe: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Oceania
22.4%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
87.5%
in 2025
Oceania rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Oceania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 87.5% against 22.4% in Oceania, a difference of 65.1%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 3.9 times Oceania's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 21 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.0% | 85.9% | 70.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 18.9% | 87.5% | 68.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 22.1% | 87.5% | 65.4% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Oceania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 87.5% against 22.4% in Oceania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Oceania and Zimbabwe?
- 65.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Oceania and Zimbabwe rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Oceania ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 21 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.