Poland vs Small island developing states (SIDS): Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered

Poland
94.3%
in 2025
Small island developing states (SIDS)
27.6%
in 2025
Poland rank
13th
Small island developing states (SIDS) rank
13th

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time

  • Poland
  • Small island developing states (SIDS)
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 94.3% against 27.6% in Small island developing states (SIDS), a difference of 66.7%.

That makes Poland's figure about 3.4 times Small island developing states (SIDS)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 13th and Small island developing states (SIDS) ranks 13th of 167 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Small island developing states (SIDS) Difference Ahead
2000s 79.3% 16.6% 62.7% Poland
2010s 92.8% 26.1% 66.7% Poland
2020s 93.8% 27.5% 66.3% Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Poland or Small island developing states (SIDS)?
Poland, at 94.3% against 27.6% in Small island developing states (SIDS) as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Poland and Small island developing states (SIDS)?
66.7%, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Small island developing states (SIDS)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Poland and Small island developing states (SIDS) rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
Poland ranks 13th and Small island developing states (SIDS) ranks 13th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Small island developing states (SIDS): Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/poland/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/poland/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Poland vs Small island developing states (SIDS): Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
206 places, 5,356 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed