Russian Federation vs South Sudan: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Russian Federation
38.7%
in 2025
South Sudan
39.6%
in 2025
Russian Federation rank
118th
South Sudan rank
117th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Russian Federation
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 39.6% against 38.7% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 118th and South Sudan ranks 117th of 195 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.4% | 39.6% | 6.2% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 36.4% | 39.6% | 3.2% | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 38.7% | 39.6% | 0.9% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Russian Federation or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 39.6% against 38.7% in Russian Federation as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Russian Federation and South Sudan?
- 0.9%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and South Sudan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Russian Federation and South Sudan rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Russian Federation ranks 118th and South Sudan ranks 117th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.