Russian Federation vs Tunisia: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Russian Federation
38.7%
in 2025
Tunisia
39.9%
in 2025
Russian Federation rank
101st
Tunisia rank
99th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Russian Federation
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 39.9% against 38.7% in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 101st and Tunisia ranks 99th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.4% | 20.4% | 13.0% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 36.4% | 38.6% | 2.2% | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 38.7% | 39.9% | 1.2% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Russian Federation or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 39.9% against 38.7% in Russian Federation as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Russian Federation and Tunisia?
- 1.2%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Russian Federation and Tunisia rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Russian Federation ranks 101st and Tunisia ranks 99th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.