Rwanda vs United Arab Emirates: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Rwanda
30.1%
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
28.4%
in 2025
Rwanda rank
121st
United Arab Emirates rank
123rd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Rwanda
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 30.1% against 28.4% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 121st and United Arab Emirates ranks 123rd of 167 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.7% | 2.0% | 22.7% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 27.6% | 13.1% | 14.5% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 29.5% | 28.4% | 1.1% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Rwanda or United Arab Emirates?
- Rwanda, at 30.1% against 28.4% in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Rwanda and United Arab Emirates?
- 1.7%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and United Arab Emirates?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and United Arab Emirates rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Rwanda ranks 121st and United Arab Emirates ranks 123rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.