Saint Helena vs Suriname: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Saint Helena
33.7%
in 2025
Suriname
34.9%
in 2025
Saint Helena rank
113th
Suriname rank
111th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Saint Helena
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 34.9% against 33.7% in Saint Helena, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Saint Helena ranks 113th and Suriname ranks 111th of 167 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Helena | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.6% | 34.9% | 6.3% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 30.6% | 34.9% | 4.3% | Suriname |
| 2020s | 33.7% | 34.9% | 1.2% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Saint Helena or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 34.9% against 33.7% in Saint Helena as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Saint Helena and Suriname?
- 1.2%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Helena and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Saint Helena and Suriname rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Saint Helena ranks 113th and Suriname ranks 111th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.