Samoa vs Suriname: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Samoa
36.4%
in 2025
Suriname
34.9%
in 2025
Samoa rank
109th
Suriname rank
111th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Samoa
- Suriname
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 36.4% against 34.9% in Suriname, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Samoa ranks 109th and Suriname ranks 111th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.3% | 34.9% | 5.6% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 35.6% | 34.9% | 0.7% | Samoa |
| 2020s | 36.0% | 34.9% | 1.1% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Samoa or Suriname?
- Samoa, at 36.4% against 34.9% in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Samoa and Suriname?
- 1.5%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Samoa and Suriname rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Samoa ranks 109th and Suriname ranks 111th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.