South Sudan vs Tunisia: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
South Sudan
39.6%
in 2025
Tunisia
39.9%
in 2025
South Sudan rank
100th
Tunisia rank
99th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- South Sudan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 39.9% against 39.6% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.6% | 20.4% | 19.2% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 39.6% | 38.6% | 1.0% | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 39.6% | 39.9% | 0.3% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, South Sudan or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 39.9% against 39.6% in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between South Sudan and Tunisia?
- 0.3%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do South Sudan and Tunisia rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- South Sudan ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 99th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.