Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands vs Zimbabwe: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered

Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
88.6%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
87.5%
in 2025
Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands rank
25th
Zimbabwe rank
27th

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time

  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
  • Zimbabwe
020406080200020122025

How they compare

Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands currently reports 88.6% against 87.5% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.1%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 195 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 18.9% 85.9% 67.0% Zimbabwe
2010s 69.4% 87.5% 18.1% Zimbabwe
2020s 86.4% 87.5% 1.1% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands or Zimbabwe?
Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands, at 88.6% against 87.5% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands and Zimbabwe?
1.1%, with Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands vs Zimbabwe: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/svalbard-and-jan-mayen-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/svalbard-and-jan-mayen-islands/zimbabwe/">Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands vs Zimbabwe: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
218 places, 5,668 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed