Sweden vs Uganda: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Sweden
76.5%
in 2025
Uganda
76.2%
in 2025
Sweden rank
37th
Uganda rank
39th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Sweden
- Uganda
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 76.5% against 76.2% in Uganda, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uganda ahead.
Sweden ranks 37th and Uganda ranks 39th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.2% | 76.2% | 0.9% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 75.6% | 76.2% | 0.6% | Uganda |
| 2020s | 76.5% | 76.2% | 0.3% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Sweden or Uganda?
- Sweden, at 76.5% against 76.2% in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Sweden and Uganda?
- 0.3%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uganda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Sweden and Uganda rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Sweden ranks 37th and Uganda ranks 39th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.