Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Thailand
85.9%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
87.5%
in 2025
Thailand rank
24th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Thailand
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 87.5% against 85.9% in Thailand, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Thailand ahead.
Thailand ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 167 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Thailand | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.9% | 85.9% | 4.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 85.7% | 87.5% | 1.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 85.9% | 87.5% | 1.6% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Thailand or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 87.5% against 85.9% in Thailand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Thailand and Zimbabwe?
- 1.6%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Thailand and Zimbabwe rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Thailand ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.