United Republic of Tanzania vs Zambia: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
United Republic of Tanzania
66.5%
in 2025
Zambia
65.3%
in 2025
United Republic of Tanzania rank
63rd
Zambia rank
66th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- United Republic of Tanzania
- Zambia
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 66.5% against 65.3% in Zambia, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zambia ahead.
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 63rd and Zambia ranks 66th of 195 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, United Republic of Tanzania averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Republic of Tanzania | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.2% | 65.3% | 10.1% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 58.0% | 65.3% | 7.3% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 66.5% | 65.3% | 1.2% | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, United Republic of Tanzania or Zambia?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 66.5% against 65.3% in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between United Republic of Tanzania and Zambia?
- 1.2%, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do United Republic of Tanzania and Zambia rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- United Republic of Tanzania ranks 63rd and Zambia ranks 66th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.