Aruba vs Czechia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Aruba
93.7%
in 2025
Czechia
94.8%
in 2025
Aruba rank
15th
Czechia rank
14th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Aruba
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 94.8% against 93.7% in Aruba, a difference of 1.1%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 15th and Czechia ranks 14th of 222 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 71.9% | 53.4% | Czechia |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 94.3% | 75.8% | Czechia |
| 2020s | 56.1% | 94.8% | 38.6% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Aruba or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 94.8% against 93.7% in Aruba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Aruba and Czechia?
- 1.1%, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Czechia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Czechia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Aruba ranks 15th and Czechia ranks 14th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.