Aruba vs Eastern Asia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Aruba
93.7%
in 2025
Eastern Asia
27.3%
in 2025
Aruba rank
15th
Eastern Asia rank
16th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Aruba
- Eastern Asia
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 93.7% against 27.3% in Eastern Asia, a difference of 66.4%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 3.4 times Eastern Asia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 15th and Eastern Asia ranks 16th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Eastern Asia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Eastern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 15.1% | 3.4% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 22.0% | 3.5% | Eastern Asia |
| 2020s | 56.1% | 26.5% | 29.6% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Aruba or Eastern Asia?
- Aruba, at 93.7% against 27.3% in Eastern Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Aruba and Eastern Asia?
- 66.4%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Eastern Asia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Eastern Asia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Aruba ranks 15th and Eastern Asia ranks 16th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.