Aruba vs Estonia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Aruba
93.7%
in 2025
Estonia
94.9%
in 2025
Aruba rank
15th
Estonia rank
13th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Aruba
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 94.9% against 93.7% in Aruba, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 15th and Estonia ranks 13th of 222 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 72.5% | 54.0% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 94.8% | 76.3% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 56.1% | 94.9% | 38.7% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Aruba or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 94.9% against 93.7% in Aruba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Aruba and Estonia?
- 1.2%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Estonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Estonia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Aruba ranks 15th and Estonia ranks 13th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.