Aruba vs Lithuania: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Aruba
93.7%
in 2025
Lithuania
92.5%
in 2025
Aruba rank
15th
Lithuania rank
16th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Aruba
- Lithuania
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 93.7% against 92.5% in Lithuania, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Aruba ranks 15th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 222 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 66.7% | 48.1% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 85.6% | 67.1% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 56.1% | 90.5% | 34.4% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Aruba or Lithuania?
- Aruba, at 93.7% against 92.5% in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Aruba and Lithuania?
- 1.2%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Lithuania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Lithuania rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Aruba ranks 15th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.