Aruba vs Malta: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Aruba
93.7%
in 2025
Malta
90.8%
in 2025
Aruba rank
15th
Malta rank
17th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Aruba
- Malta
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 93.7% against 90.8% in Malta, a difference of 2.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Aruba ranks 15th and Malta ranks 17th of 222 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 83.5% | 65.0% | Malta |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 90.6% | 72.1% | Malta |
| 2020s | 56.1% | 90.8% | 34.7% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Aruba or Malta?
- Aruba, at 93.7% against 90.8% in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Aruba and Malta?
- 2.9%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Malta?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Malta rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Aruba ranks 15th and Malta ranks 17th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.