Aruba vs Niue: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Aruba
93.7%
in 2025
Niue
95.3%
in 2025
Aruba rank
15th
Niue rank
12th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Aruba
- Niue
How they compare
Niue currently reports 95.3% against 93.7% in Aruba, a difference of 1.6%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Niue has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 15th and Niue ranks 12th of 222 countries.
Niue has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Niue | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 95.3% | 76.8% | Niue |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 95.3% | 76.8% | Niue |
| 2020s | 56.1% | 95.3% | 39.1% | Niue |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Aruba or Niue?
- Niue, at 95.3% against 93.7% in Aruba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Aruba and Niue?
- 1.6%, with Niue ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Niue?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Niue rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Aruba ranks 15th and Niue ranks 12th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.