Aruba vs Oceania: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Aruba
93.7%
in 2025
Oceania
35.8%
in 2025
Aruba rank
15th
Oceania rank
13th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Aruba
- Oceania
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 93.7% against 35.8% in Oceania, a difference of 57.9%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 2.6 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Oceania ahead.
Aruba ranks 15th and Oceania ranks 13th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Oceania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 24.7% | 6.2% | Oceania |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 32.7% | 14.2% | Oceania |
| 2020s | 56.1% | 35.7% | 20.5% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Aruba or Oceania?
- Aruba, at 93.7% against 35.8% in Oceania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Aruba and Oceania?
- 57.9%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Oceania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Oceania rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Aruba ranks 15th and Oceania ranks 13th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.