Australia and New Zealand vs Cuba: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Australia and New Zealand
54.5%
in 2025
Cuba
55.8%
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
99th
Cuba rank
98th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 55.8% against 54.5% in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 99th and Cuba ranks 98th of 253 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.9% | 28.1% | 11.8% | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 49.9% | 55.1% | 5.3% | Cuba |
| 2020s | 54.3% | 55.8% | 1.5% | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Australia and New Zealand or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 55.8% against 54.5% in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Australia and New Zealand and Cuba?
- 1.3%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Cuba?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Cuba rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 99th and Cuba ranks 98th of 253 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.