Australia vs Congo: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Australia
57.7%
in 2025
Congo
57.4%
in 2025
Australia rank
79th
Congo rank
82nd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Australia
- Congo
How they compare
Australia currently reports 57.7% against 57.4% in Congo, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 79th and Congo ranks 82nd of 222 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.7% | 27.7% | 10.0% | Australia |
| 2010s | 51.2% | 43.9% | 7.3% | Australia |
| 2020s | 57.3% | 53.4% | 4.0% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Australia or Congo?
- Australia, at 57.7% against 57.4% in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Australia and Congo?
- 0.3%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Congo rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Australia ranks 79th and Congo ranks 82nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.