Australia vs Sweden: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Australia
57.7%
in 2025
Sweden
57.6%
in 2025
Australia rank
79th
Sweden rank
80th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Australia
- Sweden
How they compare
Australia currently reports 57.7% against 57.6% in Sweden, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sweden ahead.
Australia ranks 79th and Sweden ranks 80th of 222 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.7% | 53.2% | 15.5% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 51.2% | 56.5% | 5.3% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 57.3% | 57.5% | 0.2% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Australia or Sweden?
- Australia, at 57.7% against 57.6% in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Australia and Sweden?
- 0.1%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Sweden rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Australia ranks 79th and Sweden ranks 80th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.