Belize vs New Caledonia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Belize
44.8%
in 2025
New Caledonia
43.6%
in 2025
Belize rank
122nd
New Caledonia rank
124th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Belize
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Belize currently reports 44.8% against 43.6% in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 122nd and New Caledonia ranks 124th of 222 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.1% | 8.6% | 30.5% | Belize |
| 2010s | 40.4% | 35.4% | 5.1% | Belize |
| 2020s | 43.7% | 43.6% | 0.2% | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Belize or New Caledonia?
- Belize, at 44.8% against 43.6% in New Caledonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Belize and New Caledonia?
- 1.2%, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and New Caledonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belize and New Caledonia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Belize ranks 122nd and New Caledonia ranks 124th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.