Benin vs Latvia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Benin
100.0%
in 2025
Latvia
97.3%
in 2025
Benin rank
6th
Latvia rank
9th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Benin
- Latvia
How they compare
Benin currently reports 100.0% against 97.3% in Latvia, a difference of 2.7%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Benin has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 6th and Latvia ranks 9th of 222 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 79.0% | 21.0% | Benin |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 97.3% | 2.7% | Benin |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 97.3% | 2.7% | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Benin or Latvia?
- Benin, at 100.0% against 97.3% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Benin and Latvia?
- 2.7%, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Benin and Latvia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Benin ranks 6th and Latvia ranks 9th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.