Botswana vs North Macedonia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Botswana
51.2%
in 2025
North Macedonia
50.7%
in 2025
Botswana rank
100th
North Macedonia rank
102nd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Botswana
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 51.2% against 50.7% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 100th and North Macedonia ranks 102nd of 222 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.2% | 44.3% | 6.9% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 51.2% | 47.8% | 3.4% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 51.2% | 50.6% | 0.6% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Botswana or North Macedonia?
- Botswana, at 51.2% against 50.7% in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 0.5%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and North Macedonia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Botswana ranks 100th and North Macedonia ranks 102nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.