Botswana vs Oman: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Botswana
51.2%
in 2025
Oman
52.5%
in 2025
Botswana rank
100th
Oman rank
97th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Botswana
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 52.5% against 51.2% in Botswana, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 100th and Oman ranks 97th of 222 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.2% | 16.7% | 34.5% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 51.2% | 20.6% | 30.6% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 51.2% | 38.6% | 12.6% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Botswana or Oman?
- Oman, at 52.5% against 51.2% in Botswana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Botswana and Oman?
- 1.3%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Oman?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Oman rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Botswana ranks 100th and Oman ranks 97th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.