Botswana vs Suriname: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Botswana
51.2%
in 2025
Suriname
51.2%
in 2025
Botswana rank
100th
Suriname rank
101st
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Botswana
- Suriname
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 51.2% against 51.2% in Suriname, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Botswana ranks 100th and Suriname ranks 101st of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.2% | 51.2% | 0.0% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 51.2% | 51.2% | 0.0% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 51.2% | 51.2% | 0.0% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Botswana or Suriname?
- Botswana, at 51.2% against 51.2% in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Botswana and Suriname?
- 0.0%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Botswana ranks 100th and Suriname ranks 101st of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.