Botswana vs United Arab Emirates: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Botswana
51.2%
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
49.9%
in 2025
Botswana rank
100th
United Arab Emirates rank
103rd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Botswana
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 51.2% against 49.9% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 1.3%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 100th and United Arab Emirates ranks 103rd of 222 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.2% | 16.9% | 34.3% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 51.2% | 34.6% | 16.6% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 51.2% | 49.9% | 1.3% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Botswana or United Arab Emirates?
- Botswana, at 51.2% against 49.9% in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Botswana and United Arab Emirates?
- 1.3%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and United Arab Emirates?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and United Arab Emirates rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Botswana ranks 100th and United Arab Emirates ranks 103rd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.